Subj : Re: Larry King To : alt.tv.farscape From : John Iwaniszek Date : Wed Aug 31 2005 23:56:17 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape weirdwolf wrote in news:Xns96C3F2A77A5Er73u67jw56nas@80.5.182.99: > John Iwaniszek wrote in > news:Xns96C3BF19CC368joiwhnanri@66.26.32.9: > >> weirdwolf wrote in >> news:Xns96C3E488061D5r73u67jw56nas@80.5.182.99: >> >>> Tyler Trafford wrote in >>> news:3nmla3F2a6dfU2@individual.net: >>> >>>> weirdwolf wrote: >>>>> Tyler Trafford wrote in >>>>> news:3nmkgoF2a1tqU1 @individual.net: >>>>> >>>>>> weirdwolf wrote: >>>>>>> Steve Brooks wrote: >>>>>>>> weirdwolf wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Which should lead to the development of brown field innercity >>>>>>>>> sites and the development of better mass transportation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should there be any move towards better mass transportation >>>>>>>> when petrol is a mere $4/gallon? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm an advocate of increasing fuel prices to the consumer, might >>>>>>> stop people driving the 15 minute walk to the shop. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wouldn't that just increase cost-of-living and just cause >>>>>> inflation? >>>>> >>>>> Yes and no. Prices would increase as a result of increased >>>>> transportation costs, but you could offset that by other means. >>>>> The cost of living due to spiralling petrol prices is happening >>>>> anyway, were are talking about the same sort of prices for oil as >>>>> after the Iranian revolution. It will continue to rise no matter >>>>> what, instabilities in the middle east and elsewhere, the North >>>>> sea reserves are draining rapidly, the scarcity of easily >>>>> accesable reserves mean that unless you switch to an alternative >>>>> source of power that stuff like tar sands will have to be >>>>> exploited. More difficult to extract and to actually get to, with >>>>> a corresponding price increase. A lot of the goods in this country >>>>> used to be transported by rail I'ld like to see this return. >>>> >>>> What gets me is how the price increases are due not to supply >>>> shortfalls, but by the threat of possible future shortfalls. >>> >>> No, supply shortfalls are happening now, there is just not enough >>> refining capability to produce the right fractions required. China >>> has a huge requirement which is getting larger every day. This is >>> what peak oil is all about. Wether we've reached it yet or not I am >>> uncertain, lets face it I am way to stupid to understand this kind >>> of thing, but all the data doesn't look good. >>> >> >> Demand is presently exceeding supply. Or is that merely stating the >> obvious? >> > > It's more than that, it's that the supply has reached is maximum > possible level and that this downturn in supply is coupled with a > still increasing demand. > Ted > > I know what peak oil is. I was describing the current situation: Pumping capacity is less than current demand. .