Subj : Re: So....... To : alt.tv.farscape From : Nick Date : Wed Sep 14 2005 17:47:47 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape weirdwolf wrote: > Nick wrote in > news:Xns96D17711B9D96ndtcm@204.153.244.170: > >> Steve Brooks wrote: >> >>> Nick wrote: >>>> Steve Brooks wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nick wrote: >>>>>> Steve Brooks wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> What road pricing proposals? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Basically - rather than paying a flat rate road tax each year we >>>>>>> will be charged depending on how much we drive, when, and on >>>>>>> which roads. Busy roads at 8.30 am will cost a lot more per mile >>>>>>> than quiet roads at 2.00 am (these will probably be free.) In >>>>>>> terms of social justice I see this as entirely reasonable. >>>>>>> Unfortunately it is also hellishly complicated and difficult to >>>>>>> implement. The government's plan is to use transponders in >>>>>>> vehicles combined with GPS and software. I think they've got >>>>>>> absolutely no chance of making this work. It's many times more >>>>>>> complicated than IT tasks they've already completely screwed-up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, that sounds kinda hard. Personally, I like the road tax >>>>>> being incorporated in the gas tax. >>>>> >>>>> It's nice and simple and cheap to collect. But our government does >>>>> have a point when they say some roads are in higher demand are - >>>>> therefore - a premium product. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I dunno about that. The government is the one who made the road. >>>> If they had made attractive alternate routes then it may not be that >>>> way. They could decide that they are going to do a lot of work on a >>>> particularly busy road and neglect all the rest of the roads making >>>> them less desireable to drive upon. >>> >>> I guess that's the difference between living in a country the size of >>> a continent and one the size of a postage stamp. In many cases our >>> high demand roads are so because they're the only viable route from A >>> to B - and A to B is a journey many need to make. In many cases >>> alternative routes could be constructed but it would mean losing >>> precious open space and our experience is that building more roads >>> ends up creating more traffic. >>> >>> There's also the time factor. If a road is very crowded during rush >>> hour but relatively clear at other times then making it more >>> expensive at rush hour will encourage those who can to change their >>> hours and travel at different times. >>> >> >> I'm also not too crazy about the idea that the government knows where >> you are at all times. >> > > Think thats bad, you should see the scheme they have for mandatory ID > cards, the reduction of trial by jury rights and the rise in cameras > around towns. > Ted > Ironically, I am very fond of having the government know where YOU are at all times. .