Subj : Re: Syndication To : GutPageant From : Finnigann Date : Fri Sep 09 2005 04:37:00 -=> GutPageant wrote to alt.tv.farscape <=- Gu> From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape Gu> On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 22:09:41 -0400, Nick wrote Gu> (in article ): > Jim Larson wrote: > >> Dee wrote: >> >>> What is the general consensus about how Farscape will do in >>> syndication starting in October? >>> >>> 1 Will do very well. Its popularity will allow a theatrical film >>> to be made. >>> >>> 2 It will do good. A new TV Miniseries might be made. >>> >>> 3 It will do okay, but not well enough for the financiers too >>> cough up more money. >>> >>> 4 It will start off ok but then drop as people become lost and >>> befuddled and it gets relagated to the 1:00 am slot. >>> >>> 5 Tanks immediatley. Fartscrape. YUK! >>> >>> >> >> 6 Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia >> > > Will Romaine do? Gu> I used to compare Stargate SG-1 to oatmeal--kinda bland and not too Gu> tasty. I've recently realized that's a poor analogy, what with Gu> oatmeal's actually being nutritious. Gu> I have since deemed Stargate to be the iceberg lettuce of sci-fi Gu> television. Gu> BTW, I pick #3 above, with a bit of #4 (every syndicated sci-fi show Gu> eventually winds up in the 1:00 am slot). I still think voicing a radio version would have been a good step...[1] [1] I just miss the characters. .... As a matter of FACT I DO own the road! --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46 .