Subj : Re: It seems not everyone To : alt.tv.farscape From : TNW7Z7Z7Z12345 Date : Wed Sep 07 2005 03:25:37 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.farscape Ken McElhaney wrote: > So you are saying that our efforts in Afghanistan and around the world > have had NO effect on reducing terrorist attacks against the US? So, > Osama has waiting more than four years to attack us again > because....why? It's a little early to make this declaration. With regard to attacks on US soil, it was nearly a decade between the first and second WTC attacks. And worldwide, terror attacks against other countries have increased. But more important, there is evidence that in future years there could be many more terrorists in the world: ------------ Excerpts from: "Study cites seeds of terror in Iraq: War radicalized most, probes find" By Bryan Bender, Boston Globe, July 17, 2005 "WASHINGTON -- New investigations by the Saudi Arabian government and an Israeli think tank -- both of which painstakingly analyzed the backgrounds and motivations of hundreds of foreigners entering Iraq to fight the United States -- have found that the vast majority of these foreign fighters are not former terrorists and became radicalized by the war itself." "...American intelligence officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, and terrorism specialists paint a similar portrait of the suicide bombers wreaking havoc in Iraq: Prior to the Iraq war, they were not Islamic extremists seeking to attack the United States, as Al Qaeda did four years ago, but are part of a new generation of terrorists responding to calls to defend their fellow Muslims from ''crusaders" and ''infidels." ''The president is right that Iraq is a main front in the war on terrorism, but this is a front we created," said Peter Bergen, a terrorism specialist at the nonpartisan New America Foundation, a Washington think tank." ''...To say we must fight them in Baghdad so we don't have to fight them in Boston implies there is a finite number of people, and if you pen them up in Iraq you can kill them all," said Bergen. ''The truth is we increased the pool by what we did in Iraq." "Intelligence officials worry that some of ''Iraq alumni" will use the relationships they build on the battlefields of Iraq and return to their home countries as hardened Islamic terrorists." "The CIA's National Intelligence Council concluded in a report earlier this year that ''Iraq and other possible conflicts in the future could provide recruitment, training grounds, technical skills, and language proficiency for a new class of terrorists who are 'professionalized' and for whom political violence becomes an end in itself." ----------- I thought we did the right thing in Afghanistan, but it is way too early to tell whether Iraq has ultimately increased or decreased the problem. - TNW [To e-mail me, remove 12345 from my address.] .