Subj : Re: Nobody's ... script editor
To   : alt.tv.er
From : npardue
Date : Fri Sep 30 2005 20:03:57

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.er


KL wrote:
> on 9/30/2005 12:28 PM MauiJNP said the following:
..
> >
> >
> Right, but do the rights of the baby, or it's parents usurp the rights
> of the woman carrying the baby to term?  Again, iffy ground.

Which is precisely why there are detailed, written contracts for stuff
like this.  In a general sense, the rights of the pregnant woman always
come first, but given that a surrogate mother unquestionably made the
concious decision to become pregnant, and is being paid by anothe party
to be pregnant and to eventually present them with a healthy child, I
think she also voluntarily agrees to relinquish some of those basic
rights.

(And too, IRL, most surrogate arrangements include a psychological
evaluation of the surrogate, which would surely include stuff like 'how
do you feel about c-sections!)

Naomi
>
> --
>
> KL
>
> ______________________________00
> _______________________0000000000
> ______________________00___00___00
> __________________________00____00
> _________________________00_____00
> ________________________00______00
> ________________000____00_______00
> ___________________00000000000000000
> _____________________00_________00_000
> ____________________00__________00
> ____________________00__________00
> ___________________00___________00
> _______00________00_____________00
> _________00______00______________00___
> ___________000000_________________00000
>
> ********ROLL TIDE*********
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

.