Subj : Re: Um...no comment? To : Finnigann From : Newborn Date : Wed Sep 07 2005 23:13:00 Re: Re: Um...no comment? By: Finnigann to Newborn on Wed Sep 07 2005 10:35 am > -=> Newborn wrote to sn0w0wl <=- > > Ne> Re: Re: Um...no comment? > Ne> By: sn0w0wl to Angus McLeod on > Ne> Sat Sep 03 2005 08:16 pm > > > Angus McLeod wrote: > > > Well perhaps you are correct, but as I understand it, money has been sp > > > continuously over the last several decades to bring about gradual incre > > > in the flood prevention/recovery mechanisms. Until Monkey-boy took awa > > > their funding.... > > > > Let's assume for a moment that every pres before W was putting money, > > even if it was just a little, toward fixing the problem...so why wasn't > > it at least half way better than it started out as? even if W 'took > > away their funding' what did they do with the funding they had received > > prior? he didn't cut off the money and order them to tear down the > > improvements so how is it his fault if they didn't spend it the way they > > were supposed to? > > > > -- > > "You drink, you get laid and then you die." ~~Words of wisdom from Papa > > Titus to his son Chris~~ > > > Ne> As I understand it they did receive some funds. You have to > Ne> remember > Ne> that much of the south has a reputation for corruption. Lousiana is > > Ne> one of those states that the politicans pocketmuch of the funds they > Ne> get. > > I new it applied to Florida but I didn't know > it had spread west. (I hope neither one of us is serious) > > ... A day for firm decisions!!!!! Or is it? Unfortunately, both areas have a long reputatation for Government corruption. In the county I live in in Florida (Hillsborough)I have seen county commisioners serve serious jail time for fraud. It even seems to be prevalent among Judges and many local officals. Newborn --- þ Synchronet þ Origin: The Hard Drive Cafe - Montgomery Al USA - www.hdcbbs.net .