Subj : Re: Canadian oil
To   : Finnigann
From : Frank
Date : Sat Sep 03 2005 23:20:00

  Re: Re: Canadian oil
  By: Finnigann to Frank on Sat Sep 03 2005 10:54 pm


 >  Fr> Our government just passed an energy bill, There were *NO* incentives
 >  Fr> like this in it. It was *BADLY* needed.

    and they are..

 > There were plenty of incentives, wasn't you name BIG OIL Company?

 > Isn't your president a big supporter of OIL companies? Isn't the VP a big
 > supporteer of Oil companies? Doesn't the Sec of State have OIL TANKER named
 > after her? Didn't that turd-tosser push the USA into a war with a country
 > has just gobs of oil?

 > Is there a common item in all of this? And yet people still want to say
 > here is related to oil.

 > Do you still think you need to worry about the availibility of petroleum
 > your car?

   Ahem, He's not my president. VP.. Yes he is.  Sec of State with a ship 
   named after her? I'm impressed!  War..Yes he did...


   Worry?
   With the leadership we have now and "the lack of wisdom of the electorate
   to re-elicted him" Petroleum is the least I have to worry about.

   He *STOLE* the first election and what did we do in response. Stumble ass
   out AND RE-ELECT HIM BY VOTE!!!

   Let's all sit down now and feel sorry for ourselves shall we!


       The Dark Castle BBS - thedarkcastle.net - Elkhorn City,Kentucky

---
 þ Synchronet þ The Dark Castle BBS - thedarkcastle.net - Elkhorn City,KY SysOp: Frank

.