Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : sn0w0wl
From : Finnigann
Date : Sat Sep 03 2005 05:08:00

-=> sn0w0wl wrote to Angus McLeod <=-

 sn> Angus McLeod wrote:
 >   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 >   By: sn0w0wl to Finnigann on Fri Sep 02 2005 00:02:00
 >
 >  > I've heard on the news that the issue of the potential flood problem
 >  > from a hurricane hitting New Orleans has been known for 40 years but,
 >  > amazingly, W catches the flack cause it happened during his watch...what
 >  > did Clinton do to solve the problem? Or Bush 41? Or Reagan? Or Carter?
 >  > Or Ford? Or Nixon?
 >
 > What did the others do?  Apparently, *NOT* cut funding for flood recovery
 > by 44% and divert the funds into a foreign war rapidly becomong more
 > unpopular than Vietnam.

 sn> Also, apparently *NOT* spending the money to make the needed
 sn> improvement either...if you insist on blaming W then you have to blame
 sn> everyone that preceded him for they are just as guilty...

The cuts STARTED in 2001... he replaced the director with a homeboy that didn't
know the job or how to do it. He quit to become a private adviser for Iraqi
matters in the private sector. he was replaced with the second in command,
Brown who has less of a grip on what's going on than did his boss.


.... Nuc...Nucl... Nucular... {psst what's it called, again?}
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46

.