Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Finnigann
From : Daemon
Date : Sat Sep 03 2005 03:31:00

  Re: Re: Um...no comment?
  By: Finnigann to Daemon on Sat Sep 03 2005 12:49 am

 >  Da>   *drums fingers*  Lessee...  Where to start with this one?  I mean,
 >  Da> it's just riddled with dumb stuff, both explicitly expressed and
 >  Da> strongly implied..
 > 
 > Do you think his attention spam is all that great... I mean it was a long
 > reply, and considering the original posts' lentgh... You prolly put him to
 > sleep.

  Yeah, I know.  Clearly, he doesn't read MUCH of what's expressed, or he
wouldn't be so tragically incorrect about my views while trying to roast me for
them at the same time.  Even in his reply, he STILL makes the absolutely
incorrect assumption my views are partisan, which utterly misses the point of
most of what I typed in the first place.  *shrug*

  I reply for completeness' sake, not to convert morons, in full knowledge that
most of what's said will likely zoom from ear to ear without hitting anything
in between (metaphorically speaking, of course, as this is a text medium).  But
not to, to me, represents a surrender to ignorance, faulty assumptions, and
pretty much everything that's wrong with the establishment AND, progressively,
the culture.  

  I'd rather err by far on the side of detailed communication rather than
dumb-down the replies to suit intellectual laziness.  The whole point of
replying to political topics, in most cases I bother to, is to address the
point.  Not the person.


       [daemon]                 
       In the shuffling madness...      



---
 þ Synchronet þ necropolisbbs.darktech.org - Tonawanda, NY

.