Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Angus McLeod
From : sn0w0wl
Date : Fri Sep 02 2005 23:44:00

Angus McLeod wrote:
>   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
>   By: sn0w0wl to Finnigann on Fri Sep 02 2005 00:02:00
> 
>  > I've heard on the news that the issue of the potential flood problem
>  > from a hurricane hitting New Orleans has been known for 40 years but,
>  > amazingly, W catches the flack cause it happened during his watch...what
>  > did Clinton do to solve the problem? Or Bush 41? Or Reagan? Or Carter?
>  > Or Ford? Or Nixon?
> 
> What did the others do?  Apparently, *NOT* cut funding for flood recovery 
> by 44% and divert the funds into a foreign war rapidly becomong more 
> unpopular than Vietnam.

Also, apparently *NOT* spending the money to make the needed improvement 
either...if you insist on blaming W then you have to blame everyone that 
preceded him for they are just as guilty...

-- 
"You drink, you get laid and then you die." ~~Words of wisdom from Papa 
Titus to his son Chris~~

---
 þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it

.