Subj : Re: Canadian oil
To   : Angus McLeod
From : Deuce
Date : Fri Sep 02 2005 23:03:00

  Re: Re: Canadian oil
  By: Angus McLeod to Deuce on Fri Sep 02 2005 20:47:00

 > This is NOT what you have been saying.  You have been saying that "every
 > effort" needs to be made towards building more refineries, drilling more
 > wells, etc.  That doesn't sould like "BOTH lines of reseaarch" to me.

If you follow this thread back (on my board, the message that is numerically
118 before this one) you'll find a message where I quote the following from:

 > I am not. But it seems clear to me that we wont have a choice in the not too
 > distant future.

I understand that, but you are (unless I misunderstand) advocating seeking a
renewable source instead of seeking more non-renewable ones.  It's not an
either-or situation.  We need to seek BOTH because until we actually FIND a
renewable one, we really have to keep the existing stuff going.  It would be
incalcuably worse to run out of oil without a replacement on tap.

---
 þ Synchronet þ ``Penguins make tasty snacks''

.