Subj : Re: James Bond To : The Millionaire From : Finnigann Date : Sun Oct 16 2005 08:42:00 -=> The Millionaire wrote to Angus McLeod <=- TM> Re: Re: James Bond TM> By: Angus McLeod to The Millionaire on Sat Oct 15 2005 11:13 pm > Re: Re: James Bond > By: The Millionaire to Finnigann on Fri Oct 14 2005 21:24:00 > > > > Some more bad news. "Casino Royale" ain't new... > > > > Not new? They're filming the movie in January 2006! > > And I certainly hope it is better than the *first* Casino Royale, a > terrible semi-comedy/spoof treatment starring David Niven as an elderly > James Bond that I regret I saw about 35 years ago. Yeeech! It has > haunted my sleep ever since! > > > TM> Yeah I agree. That movie was kinda dumb. In my opinion, a waste of film TM> as a matter of fact. But that's hollywood for you. They like to turn TM> out low budget movies. Especially, these days are even worse. The last TM> good movie I enjoyed was "Miss Congeniality" in 2000. Haven't seen TM> anything worth noting since then. Maybe I'm just getting old, but... A good movie has to stand up to multiple viewings. Miss Congeniality doesn't. Mostly do to the poor acting of the male love interest. What's his name... [1] used to play (equally bad) cop... This guy is only getting by on his looks (such as they are) Snadra Bullock is a fine actress and many of her other movies DO stand up to the multiple viewings I like "Speed" with the Keanu Reeves. I have some of her DVD's I like 'Practical Magic' w/Nicole Kidman28 Days is another good movie Sandra Bullock is a fine actress and I will watch anything she is in at least once. [1] Benjamin Bratt Also worth the trip is: Two Weeks Notice w/Hugh Grant Murder by Numbers The Net ีอออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออ ณ "We live in a society exquisitely ณ dependent on science and technology, ณ in which hardly anyone knows anything ณ about science and technology." ณ - Carl Sagan .... It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you. --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46 .