Subj : Re: Female Spam is a virus To : Stewart Honsberger From : Sean Rima Date : Fri Feb 15 2002 12:46 pm Stewart Honsberger was alleged to have said to Sean Rima something about Female Spam is a virus SH> are SH> ST>> gateways... SH> SH> SR> No, Shannon they are no. BW is not converting to another network. SH> SR> Nothing in the BW packet is converted to the protocols of any other SH> SR> network. SH> SH> Actually, it is. Messages are converted into the BlueWave format where SH> they can SH> be manipulated and even stored on a user's machine. SH> SH> In order to retreive [BlueWave/QWK/NNTP] mail, one must connect to the SH> proper SH> daemon with the correct client software. SH> SH> In all cases, the mail is converted from its native format to a format SH> more SH> suited to transport to a client who will then retreive (as you said SH> below) a SH> 'snapshot' of the message bases. SH> SH> NNTP is covered by RFCs. BlueWave has governing documents known under a SH> different name - data format specifications. (I might even still have SH> them in SH> my home directory somewhere). QWK is covered by similar documents. SH> SH> SR> If you say, which I never have, the BW is converting protocols, SH> then so SH> SR> is any Mail reader. SH> SH> That's getting into picking nits, but if you really want to get into it, SH> yes; SH> every mail processor is converting the messages from one format to SH> another. I'm SH> not aware of any system that stores messages in the PKT2+ format. SH> Instead, they SH> convert them to Hudson, JAM, Squish, SQL, or any number of others (some SH> open, SH> some proprietary). SH> No it is not getting into picking NITS. I never once brought the subject of QWK, Bluewave etc up, that was others. My point is that when changed to NNTP a lot of the original format is lost and I have a specific rule against access via NNTP. Sean .... Linux -- "It's computing, Jim, but not as we know it" --- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-3 * Origin: TCOB1 The home of LinuxNet (2:263/950) .