Subj : Netmail
To   : David Calafrancesco
From : Ross Cassell
Date : Sun Sep 23 2001 08:57 am

Hello David!

23 Sep 01 15:37, you wrote to me:

 RC>> Doesnt it bother you that a netmail has gone missing, given all
 RC>> this wonderful intent behind the IRNROUTE chart?

 DC> Sure it does... but as you are Roy's uplink I would think you would be
 DC> concerned more than me ;)

One must first ascertain if Roy routed it through me, I have asked him when and 
if he did route it at all.

Its possible that he routed through Todd?

Its also possible he might have did the direct thing?

Out of curiousity I looked at the (*) 18 different netmail logs I had from OT, 
didnt see anything in there, I suspect he routed it via Todd, if so welp we 
know how that record plays dont we?

(*) I have more logs but I ruled out September.

As far as being his uplink, I aint his only uplink, he is linked to 1:10/345 
and to varying degree's I believe he has something in place with both 1:10/3 
and 1:103/301, you knew this right?

Of course I am concerned about his netmail, but had it reached me it would have 
gotten to Dale, I have had a link with Dale in some fashion or another since I 
believe sometime in 1999, maybe 1998 I forgot when it was he switched off of 
1:12/12 to me for his echomail (Ken Charged I didnt). So rest assured my 
routing statements for NET 379 havent been changed, Dale and I have a ERN link 
which is quite reactive if you would care to look at the matrix chart of the 
route list you adore and the list you hate.

I can provide you with some NETMAIL.LOG excerpts showing plenty of ERN meant 
for destinations in NET 379 if you require?

Actually I determined 2 weeks ago that both Dale and Todd havent been routing 
to NET 120 as published in IRNROUTE, much less any other chart. During that 
discovery I also discovered that ERN that passed through 1:10/345 was held up 
for 3 days, a month or more ago, I believe he had some sort of stoppage that 
held some up for 2 weeks via a admission he made in his admin echo that he was 
feeding me (a wise and courageous admission - kudo's to him). This is just the 
tip of the iceberg of routing issues that have arisen with Todd however.

Its also entirely possible that Dale did get the netmail and either chose not 
to respond or because the to name was for Z1B Operations, he may not have 
reacted to it like he would if the To name was his name?

==
Ross
http://www.the-estar.com:8080
ross@the-estar.com or rcassell@home.com ICQ = 5305939
.... The avalanche has already started, its too late for the pebbles to vote.
--- GoldED+/W32 snapshot-2001.5.29
 * Origin: The Eastern Star [Mail Hub] - 864.573.7069 (1:18/500)

.