Subj : ERN Charting Committee To : Jack Yates From : Roy Witt Date : Mon Jun 18 2001 11:36 am Hello Jack. 17 Jun 01 17:28, you wrote to me: AS>>>> JY>>> You might be on shaky ground including the point (whomever it JY>>> might be) in any policy complaint, nodelisted sysop or not. JY>>> Points are not members of this network and the action for which JY>>> you would file a complaint would be an act of the point, not the JY>>> sysop. RW>> Better read your policy again. JY> Nah; read the sentence again, Roy, It'll come into context after a JY> while.. ;-) Third or fouth time and it's still not right. Node is responsible for the point, whoever it may be. To make your case, you need to include the point's activities in your complaint. RW>> It would depend on the address of the point used. Using 379/1.50 RW>> would mean the NC of that net gets the PC. If he uses his own node RW>> number, 259/116.50, then it'd go to his NC. Gotta start at the RW>> right place to avoid the complications you're implying. JY> S'what I've been saying... OK. .... This message was posted to me by Zork. a FUG member. -jw- --- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000 * Origin: 1998 FLAME echo - Asshole Of the Year! (1:10/22) .