Subj : Re: 2:280/1141
To   : Stewart Honsberger
From : Dale Ross
Date : Sun Jun 10 2001 05:21 pm

 RC>> You haven't given us any proof that you are *not* a liar, either, you
 RC>> realise.
>
> The burden of proof lies on the claimant, you realize. All evidence up to
> this point about Foxy's alledged "SEEN-BY stuffing" is circumstantial.
> Granted, it does tend to lean one very close to believing there was intent,
> there still isn't anything concrete. Put the noose and shackles away for
> now, hmm?

There is a little bit more than circumstantial evidence here. And all the 
evidence in this situation is overwhelmingly convincing. Technical experts can 
prove that the SEEN-BY stuffing can only occur through direct manual 
intervention on Foxy's part. Even someone with a minimal understanding of tics 
understands that.

It would be EXTREMELY difficult to come up with a story to explain the 
situation with the tic for that routing file. If it were a single node it would 
be easier but still very difficult if that single node didn't connect to her 
system for files. That is why she has not said anything because try as she may, 
she cannot come up with a story.

Dale

....Maxwell House SEEN-BY's: Good to the last dropped node.
--- FTNed 2001 Build 0040-RC1/Win2k
 * Origin: http://www.HarborWebs.com:8080 (1:379/1)

.