Subj : Re: Mystic BBS
To   : Michael Grant
From : Dale Ross
Date : Thu May 17 2001 10:29 am

CA>> The MSGIDs are 100% correct. James fixed that one, Michael.
>
> Good... maybe now Dale won't have to stay up late reading my Mystic BBS
> messages that were getting caught in his "neat and stricter" traps before.

What are you talking about? You had one message, which was trapped, and it was 
NOT a Mystic BBS generated messages. I have NEVER seen a problem with ANY of 
your Mystic BBS messages. And your "neat and stricter"

That is not what I said and it would help if you brought that comment into 
context. Yes I worked on a neater trap. That trap was worked on so that I could 
catch more dupes and have less good messages sidelined. That is why it was 
neat. The stricter comment comes from my statement that my system was 
"probably" a little stricter because of that trap. As it turned out the traps 
that I worked out did not work like I planned and they added nothing. Did not 
increase or decrease the amount of work I had to put into the system. So the 
fact is that my system is not any stricter than it was when I made the original 
comment on 4/21 and it is not any less strict. But the fact remains that you do 
not know how strict why system is/was.

Dale

.... 'A MILLION HOUSEHOLD USES!
--- FTNed 2001 Build 0040-RC1/Win2k
 * Origin: http://www.HarborWebs.com:8080 (1:379/1)

.