Subj : RE: ERRORS in Route List!
To   : Andrea Santos
From : Stewart Honsberger
Date : Sat May 12 2001 02:38 pm

Hello Andrea!

May 12 2001 20:46, Andrea Santos wrote to Stewart Honsberger:

 ->> So it's ok that nodes in R12 move around from net to net, so long as 
 ->> it's not infringing on the rights of the other regions to have as 
 ->> many nodes as possible? Interesting.

 AS> What's more interesting is you bringing up the "many nodes as possible". 
 AS> Unless there's a technical problem (which would include no response from 
 AS> NC/RC) or a situation similar to Ruth Argust's former Region 10 Net, your 
 AS> Region has no business listing nodes which should be listed in other 
 AS> Regions.

ROTFL! Still can't answer the tough question of "Why?", so you continue your 
jealous tirade! How forking hilarious!

Had you ever considered that just bloody-well listing nodes in Z1 was 
sufficient? Perhaps if we concentrated more on getting nodes LISTED as opposed 
to where they were listed, who their NC was, who their RC was, who their ZC 
was, what rights they do and don't have, who their mail feeds are, who they can 
be, how many route lists we can make in a month, which route list is right, 
which mail movers are more right than the others; perhaps Zone 1 would actually 
be showing + figures in the weekly nodelist stats?

No, of course not, it's more important that R12 not grow than it is that Z1 
grow.

{hands Andrea another sheet of nails}

I figure at this point, see, that you must be using an air-nailer. Nobody could 
pound that many nails without slipping a disc.

[Stewart Honsberger] [blackdeath@softhome.net] [http://tinys.cx/blackdeath/]

        "Without deviation, progress is not possible."
             -- Frank Zappa

--- Msged/LNX TE 06 (pre)
 * Origin: Stewart's Echomail Node-Holder (1:229/604)

.