Subj : Re: ERRORS in Route List!
To   : Carol Shenkenberger
From : Stewart Honsberger
Date : Sun May 13 2001 11:32 am

Hello Carol!

May 13 2001 13:49, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Stewart Honsberger:

 AS>> Actually, I think the NC of 229 at the time needs to prove there was
 AS>> any attempt made by either him, or the node in question, to contact 
 AS>> Jack Yates, who would have been the applicable *C in 18.  

 SH>> A node was listed. Why does anybody need to prove anything?

 CS> Actually, I dont think it's so much a matter of 'proof' as that the 

So nice of you to help remove Andrea's overly sized foot from her overly sized 
mouth, but she's more than capable of making a gigantic ass of herself without 
outside assistance.

 CS> new sysop was at least told he had a local net he could join, with 
 CS> possible local events and such (cookouts, that sort of thing).

All this hub-bub is about the possibility of a few missed hamburgers? Please, 
that's pretty weak Carol.

 CS> I find it hard to believe Jack Yates wouldnt respond fast.  I suspect 
 CS> the node was never told about his local net possibilities, nor was 
 CS> Jack contacted.

Why does a node even have to default to a geographically local net?

 CS> It's one thing to deal with 'Its Thursday and last second and he 
 CS> wants in now' and 'list it then never contact the involved persons so 
 CS> it can be swapped later'.  Aparently that second part didnt kick in, 
 CS> but it should have.  It's possible it's in progress now though if 
 CS> it's a really new listing?

Why?!?

[Stewart Honsberger] [blackdeath@softhome.net] [http://tinys.cx/blackdeath/]

        "Without deviation, progress is not possible."
             -- Frank Zappa

--- Msged/LNX TE 06 (pre)
 * Origin: Stewart's Echomail Node-Holder (1:229/604)

.