Subj : ERNROUTE.126
To   : Stewart Honsberger
From : Jack Yates
Date : Thu May 10 2001 01:18 pm

 SH>>> Rather than vaguely critique their incorrect routes, had you
 SH>>> considered supplying them with valid routes instead?

 JY>> Yes, I have.

 SH> You'll have to pardon my ignorance,

You are pardoned.


 SH> I haven't seen any such thing.

That's correct.

 SH> A lot of complaining, very little positive input.

No complaining from me, just a note that the list, as produced is incorrect and
has no substance as, while using the pathline shown in echomail messages may
give a particular route that the message took, the creators of the list have
only done half the job.  Th elist isn't valid until the other half is
performed.

The question was "Had I considered."  Yes, I have considered, and decided that
it really didn't matter because the majority of people who are in need of a
routelist aren't going to use ERNROUTE anyway, why give it credence by begging
for corrections?

I'll stick with the "Official" list, if any.



---
 * Origin:    (1:3613/1275)

.