Subj : Z1_REC
To   : Bob Seaborn
From : Dave Hamilton
Date : Tue Apr 17 2001 10:14 am

 BS>
 BS>       It means that you should consult either the ROUTELST.* that the ZEC1
 BS> issues weekly or the ROUTELST.R17 that the REC17 produces to answer your 
questions.
 BS>   NO other document is acceptable, or to be considered accurate.
 BS>

Why? You don't even use it yourself. The "official" routelst routes to 1:229 
via 1:10/345 but you don't use that route. Why not?

Even the ZEC publishes the route(s) that net 229 wants. So why should anyone 
hold that "official document in higher regard than you do?

 BS> 140/1 accepts inbound routing for any nodelisted node, worldwide.

But we can't predict how you'll get it there, can we?

Why are you so worried about somebody investing enough time to come up with a 
reliable routing document that exists for the benefit of Fidonet? If it isn't 
better than what's aleady there, no one will use it. You think a second-rate 
effort ought to have government protection from free competition?



--- FTNed v0.23h/Win32
 * Origin: Aurora Exploratoria telnet://aurorabbs.dyndns.org (1:229/622)

.