Subj : Z1_REC
To   : Bob Seaborn
From : Darrell Salter
Date : Tue Apr 17 2001 01:26 pm

Bob Seaborn wrote in a message to Carl Austin Bennett:

 > How can you consider the two documents you mention acceptable and
 > accurate when one listed a false route to misdirect mail for one of my
 > region's nets to some place in New York for half of last month and the
 > other is very outdated?

 BS>       I merely supply some data to be incorporated in the
 BS> ROUTELST.* that teh ZEC1 produces.  I verify the part that I
 BS> supply.  I don't believe I was involved in the errors that you
 BS> mention.

I see. So what exactly do you throw those titles around for then?

 > I'm already painfully aware of the pitfalls of basing in-region routing
 > info on that provided by other external lists when the outside lists are
 > incorrect.

 BS>       Whatever.

Nothing to say huh?

 > It may be best that I allow the individual NC/NECs to address this
 > issue.
 > Each one will have to decide individually if this route is valid or not.

 BS>       Actually, I'd say it's up to the individual links to decide
 BS> what nets they will accept inbound routing for.

You'd say? :)

 >BS> I accept the fact that I was told by a former REC12 that REG12 was
 >BS> available to anyone who wished it, no restrictions.
 >
 > Not true; REG12 is and always has been a restricted admin echo.
 > No REC in this region would've made the claims you've alleged.

 BS>       Prove it!

You first.

 > REG12 has always been restricted. There is nothing to quietly discuss.

 BS>       Whatever Carl, play your games all you want.

Thank you, O most infamous one. 

Darrell

darrell@sprk.com 
--- 
 * Origin: Sparky's (1:229/438)

.