Subj : Z1_REC
To   : Bob Seaborn
From : Darrell Salter
Date : Tue Apr 17 2001 01:02 pm

Bob Seaborn wrote in a message to Carl Austin Bennett:

 > Does this mean that you are not a valid inbound route for ERN destined
 > to the REC12 system or its downlinks?

 BS>       It means that you should consult either the ROUTELST.* that
 BS> the ZEC1 issues weekly or the ROUTELST.R17 that the REC17 produces
 BS> to answer your questions.  

Don't know the answer huh? Figures.

 BS> NO other document is acceptable, or to be considered accurate. 

Even if it is vastly more accurate and vastly more acceptable? Sorry, no dice.

 BS>       What you choose to do is entirely up to you!

Now you're getting the picture. BTW, your permission was not/is not required so 
save your self-important breath.

 > This is interesting... you are completely incapable of grasping the
 > concept that REG12 is a restricted administrative echo and allow out-
 > of-region sysops to post, yet you lambaste REC12 for hatching a route
 > list into Z1_REC.

 BS>       I accept the fact that I was told by a former REC12 that
 BS> REG12 was available to anyone who wished it, no restrictions.  I

Look at that nose! LOL!

 BS> accept the fact that NOBODY instructed me differently when the
 BS> former REC12 dropped out.  

Don't you know that building on lies is doomed to collapse?

 BS> I accept the fact that up until last week there was NO elist entry 
 BS> for REG12 to check with.  

Irrelevant, but nice try.

 BS> I accept the fact that I have never seen any rules posted for 
 BS> REG12. 

Well gosh, I never saw any Z1REGCON rules posted either but I knew enough to 
get permission first. 

 BS> Now that you, as RC12, elisted the echotag, and have stated your
 BS> position, the limits on REG12 changed, it would have been nice if
 BS> you had a quiet discussion, instead of turning it into a political
 BS> statement, but whatever, it's your echo, you do what you wish.

Now you're getting the picture. BTW, your permission was not/is not required so 
save your self-important breath.

 > Something doesn't quite mesh here, Bob!

 BS>       Sure does, the requirements for Z1_REC were put into place
 BS> day one, and haven't changed since.  The requirements for REG12
 BS> changed last week. 

Post 'em then.

 > If Z1_REC were a moderated echo (and restricted echo isn't enough as
 > REC12 has the right to be there) may I ask where a copy of the .RUL file
 > can be found?

 BS>       Better learn something

Your nose is growing again. I wonder what that means.

 BS> , Z1_REC is NOT a message echo, it's a fileecho. You are NOT a 
 BS> REC, therefor you have no rights to be involved in it.  Some day 
 BS> you may understand how to move mail and files.

So says Bob. What a loser.

Darrell

darrell@sprk.com 
--- 
 * Origin: Sparky's (1:229/438)

.