Subj : alternate routing chart To : Bob Seaborn From : Darrell Salter Date : Tue Apr 17 2001 12:46 pm Bob Seaborn wrote in a message to Lesley-Dee Dylan: >BS> I'm pointing this at you because you are the >BS> hatch point for these bogus >BS> routing charts. > > Bogus? The current "official" list keeper is no longer official, by her BS> BOGUS! Yes you are. > own words, since her listing as ZLC was removed from the nodelist. > Therefore, Foxy is just a volunteer, just as the other committee are > just volunteers. BS> The job of maintaining the official Zone One Routing chart BS> was assigned by the former ZC1 to the former ZEC1. The former ZEC1 BS> chose to not do it himself, so he assigned someone else to do the BS> job. Since Foxy *IS* the current ZEC1, it is a given that she is BS> willing, AND *able* to do the job herself. Willing yes, but able? Um ... ;-) BS> It is not up to you, or anuone else, to take that away from BS> her. ONLY the ZC1 is able to do so. ROTFL! BS> I am ashamed You should be. You should also be ashamed to be charging for your pathetic feed. I don't believe you have ever been ashamed in your life. BS> to have my name and position associated with these bogus files, What's the matter, too accurate for you? BS> and have chosen to NOT associate myself with the power-mongers who BS> choose to hide behind Stephen. ROTFL! What power, exactly, is being mongered here, Bob? BS> Since permission to use my name, position, or node numbers, was BS> not sought PRIOR to publication, I refuse to have it used now. What a headcase. > secret? Why? Exactly how old is the last routing chart produced in > Region 17? Do you have that much need to control the flow of mail in > Western Canada? That kind of power is corrupting, Bob. Trying to > maintain control and power can lead to breaches of trust, just like > happened with Bob Kohl. BS> ROUTELST.R17 is none of your business, you are not in R17, BS> therefore have no say. R17 is happy with me as their REC, beyond BS> that you are not to be involved. Sorry but, you've fucked up. They like having you for a fuckup? LOL! > All this talk about how the Z1B is "splitting" fidonet, and when some > volunteers put together a committee to attempt some real help to Fido, > this is the response they get - "No, you can't do that, I didn't give > you permission." BS> Because their obvious attempt to usurp the official policies BS> and documents is well documented. LOL! Please point us to the source of these "documents". > What makes you think permission is needed in writing to make reference > to someone in a document? Do you think the Saskabush Ratter, or > whatever your local newspaper is called, needs Jean Cretien's permission > to make reference to him in an article? Does the Canadian Post Office > have permission to post your address in their postal code books and on > their web site? BS> Yes, they do, at least as far as I am concerned. Hahaha! I knew it! > But I kind of think that the needed permission was granted by someone > higher up the heirarchy, with several challenges to others to produce an > alternate routelist. BS> No permission was ever sought of me, or granted by me! So, you're just another fuckup. No surprise there. > Amazing, isn't it? Someone took her up on her challenge. And that just > makes you livid! And you even want to block distribution in the > existing channels. BS> Yes, because as I previously stated, should someone wish BS> those documents distributed, they should have been supplied to the BS> ZEC1 for distribution. Can't. She's a fuckup too. BS> It's quite obvious that you wish to bypass the official BS> distribution channels to sponsor your own form of anarchy. And I, BS> for one, am not prepared to cooperate, or be involved. Then shut up and let the people that want to fix the mess fix it. Your self-importance to this network is a product of your imagination. Were you to leave tomorrow I wouldn't miss you at all. :-) Darrell darrell@sprk.com --- * Origin: Sparky's (1:229/438) .