Subj : 1:10/345
To   : Chris Cranford
From : mark lewis
Date : Wed Nov 28 2001 01:03 pm

 CC> On 11/28/2001 7:22 PM, ROSS CASSELL wrote to CHRIS CRANFORD:

->> I really dont think you paid a bit of attention to
->> that which I wrote?

 CC> Think what you wish as you may; however IMO you
 CC> contradicted yourself with that one statement in
 CC> your post.  Regardless of how you try to twist
 CC> it, I'll consider it a contradicting stand at an
 CC> attempt to make a point.

FWIW: ross was making the point about connections between hubs... not the time 
involved... the more hubs that are interconnected, the less hops mail has to 
take to get to the destination... hops are a bad thing when there are too many 
or one or more in the trail are having problems of one sort or another... 
that's what he was saying...

 CC> Additionally, Dale had already begun arrangements
 CC> that had the ERN link been removed, the impact to
 CC> those involved would have been very minimal or
 CC> more-or-less transparent simply because the network
 CC> and links my uplink has to minimize mail delivery
 CC> as a mail mover.

errrmmm... don't let dale blow smoke in your eyes... he has the "same" 
connection capabilities that ross has... in fact, you have those same abilities 
as well... dale's not doing anything all that special or complicated in the 
movement of mail...

)\/(ark

 
* Origin: (1:3634/12)

.