Subj : back in business
To   : BJ”RN FORSSTR”M
From : CHARLES ANGELICH
Date : Wed Dec 29 2004 05:57 pm

123a365888ff
windows



Hello Bj”- 

BF>> Is it really necessary to have USB 2.0? Isn't 1.0 enough? 

RW>> I believe so in some cases. However, some devices (such as
RW>> cablemodems and DVD/CD burners that attach to the USB
RW>> port) take advantage of the higher speeds that USB 2.0
RW>> supports. 

BF> But here it is about a modem that works ok on a slow serial
BF> port and would work just fine on a USB 1.0 port. I have a
BF> 256 MB USB 2.0 pocket memory that works fine with USB 1.0,
BF> it only takes a bit more time but that's not the same as
BF> with a slow modem. If a modem works on a serial port it
BF> would certainly be enough with the speed on a USB 1.0 port. 

The part you are overlooking is that I have repeatedly pointed
out I want the external modem for Linux compatibility. It was
never a question as to what Windows can mickey-mouse into
working for Windows. 

>
>        ,                          ,
>      o/      Charles.Angelich      \o       ,
>     <|                              |>  __o/
>     / >          USA, MI           < \   __\__
--- * ATP/16bit 2.31 * 
.... DOS the Ghost in the Machine! http://www.devedia.com/dosghost/
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)

.