Subj : Re: CPU overload?
To   : tom
From : Ellen K.
Date : Tue Feb 13 2001 01:58 pm

From: Ellen K. <72322.1016@compuserve.com>

Yikes.

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 02:45:36 -0600, tom <tgregory@xsite.net> wrote in message 
<3A88F430.471@xsite.net>:

>Dos Edit through Dos 6.xx, and NT through ver 4.
>The Edit that shipped after that, the one that doesn't use the qbasic.
>files, doesn't exhibit the behavior.
>
>It's a great diagnostic tool. Alt-f and the cpu is pegged at 100%.
>
>
>Ellen K. wrote:
>>
>> REALLY?!?!?!?
>>
>> On 12 Feb 2001 05:40:56 GMT, Dale.Ross@p0.f1.n379.z1.fidonet.org wrote
>> in message <b0ac86.4c051c@harborwebs.com>:
>>
>> >I'll give you a perfect example of a killer. Run DOS edit in Windows NT,
heck
>> >even Windows 2000. Not pretty. I bugged this in every version of Windows NT
>> >from 3.1 on.
>> >
>> >Dale
>> >

--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
 * Origin: telnet://HarborWebs.com http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)

.