Subj : Re: NPTL2 or something
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : SenderX
Date : Mon Jan 03 2005 12:32 pm

> The eventcount itself has no destructor, just the usual explicit
> destroy function.  No cancelation or exception handling.  It
> shouldn't need it.

So, waiting on an eventcount would not be a cancellation point? Basically, I 
was wondering if your C++ stuff is dependant on the OS calling the 
destructors for stack-local objects upon thread cancellation. C++ and 
cancellation scared me into developing my library in assembly language and 
plain C.

I am not sure how different operating systems handle this issue...

:O

.