Subj : Re: Solaris real-time thread capabilities To : comp.unix.solaris,comp.programming.threads From : DavidEng Date : Fri Oct 07 2005 04:08 pm test "Fran Horan" wrote in message news:dhj9l7$hng$1@aplcore.jhuapl.edu... > Still interested in hearing a status report if ready ... > > Thanks, > Fran > > > > wrote in message > news:1126282812.174399.185030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > > Fran Horan wrote: > > > capnwhit, any new status on this problem ? I'm interested > > > to know if solved yet and what solved it. > > > > > Hello Fran, I've been swamped recently and haven't been able to test > > the theories and suggestions so generously provided by the community, > > but trust me, I will... I modified the test program written by our > > friend Greg Menke to add "bins" (as in "buckets" not "binaries"). I > > modified it to contain one extra bucket for the "Overflows" (and > > removed the printf), I removed the unnecessary check for wraparound of > > gethrtime since the program probably won't run for a couple of > > centuries ;-) I defined "overflow" to be more than 100 ms and I created > > only 10 buckets instead of Greg's 50. I have been meaning to run my > > series of tests with the modified program but haven't had a chance > > yet... I will do this shortly. Thanks a lot for your interest in this > > problem and for your earlier posts... Imagine what the human race could > > achieve if everybody was willing to share their knowledge freely, > > politely, and unselfishly like so many contributors to Usenet... I want > > to take this opportunity to thank you personally for doing your part... > > > > .