Subj : Re: transactional memory question
To   : comp.arch,comp.programming.threads
From : Chris Thomasson
Date : Tue Oct 04 2005 11:55 am

> a portable version of the journal filesystem code with explicit
> lock/logging changes in the code turned up the explicit lock/logging
> calls had lower overhead than transactional memory (at least in the
> journal filesystem case).

[...]

> A Fault Tolerant Tightly Coupled Multiprocessor Architecture based on
> Stable Transactional Memory
>
> Authors: Michel Banatre and Philippe Joubert

Humm... Very interesting. Thank you. Any information on transactional memory 
and scalability?

;)

.