Subj : Re: STL Containers w/ Virtually Zero-Overhead Lock-Free Reads... To : (Usenet) From : Chris Thomasson Date : Wed Sep 28 2005 07:15 am "kimo" wrote in message news:1127609579.594846.103030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > Hey Chris- > > Since you have patented the method and we are all programmers here, > please post the actual code or detailed psuedo code, so there is no > more beating around the bush- > > I think we are are interested in your innovation but are getting caught > up on definition of terms. I am sorry for that. Unfortunately, I simply have to run some documentation by another party before I have permission to publicly post some details on how my stuff actually works. This should be cleared before 2006, and then I can go ahead and post some fairly detailed pseudo-code and figures. The problem is there are a couple of embodiments that fall under the same claims, and its hard to choose which one to publish. I am not sure I should post the "preferred embodiment", when there are others that still generate high performance numbers, but don't give away something "too private..." ;) [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ] .