Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : David Hopwood
Date : Thu Sep 01 2005 12:42 am

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> David Hopwood wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>Yes, but PC alone does not imply load == load.acq.
>>(I think; I'm not 100% sure.)
> 
> Heck,

Yes, OK, OK, I was wrong. No need to rub it in :-)

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@blueyonder.co.uk>

.