Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Mayan Moudgill
Date : Tue Aug 30 2005 03:47 pm

Joe Seigh wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
>> Joe Seigh wrote:
>>
>>> I'm talking about loads, not stores, and I'm wondering why the 
>>> documentation
>>> isn't symetric with how loads and stores are treated.
>>
>>
>>
>> If tech writers were obsessively exacting, they'd be programmers ;-)
>> Do the appropriate people monitor the Intel/AMD developer forums to get
>> questions like this answered?
>>
> 
> We'll find out. :)
> 
> Technically it would have to be a quasi-authoritative statement
> distinquishable from a quasi-authoritative opinion.
> 
> 
Ask in comp.arch, people like Andy Glew and others might be able to give 
a reasonably authoritative answer.

.