Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Joe Seigh
Date : Tue Aug 30 2005 12:45 pm

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Joe Seigh wrote:
> 
>>I'm talking about loads, not stores, and I'm wondering why the documentation
>>isn't symetric with how loads and stores are treated.
> 
> 
> If tech writers were obsessively exacting, they'd be programmers ;-)
> Do the appropriate people monitor the Intel/AMD developer forums to get
> questions like this answered?
> 

We'll find out. :)

Technically it would have to be a quasi-authoritative statement
distinquishable from a quasi-authoritative opinion.


-- 
Joe Seigh

When you get lemons, you make lemonade.
When you get hardware, you make software.

.