Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Sean Kelly
Date : Tue Aug 30 2005 09:37 am

Joe Seigh wrote:
>
> I'm talking about loads, not stores, and I'm wondering why the documentation
> isn't symetric with how loads and stores are treated.

If tech writers were obsessively exacting, they'd be programmers ;-)
Do the appropriate people monitor the Intel/AMD developer forums to get
questions like this answered?


Sean

.