Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Mon Aug 29 2005 09:35 pm


Joe Seigh wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Joe Seigh wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>I already proved processor consistency doesn't work the way you think
> >>it does.
> >
> >
> > http://research.compaq.com/wrl/people/kourosh/papers/1990-rc-isca.pdf
> > http://research.compaq.com/wrl/people/kourosh/papers/1993-tr-68.pdf
> 
> Same thing.
> I do not think this "processor consistency" means what you think it means.

Show me your proof for this processor consistency.

regards,
alexander.

.