Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Mon Aug 29 2005 09:23 pm


Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> 
> Torsten Robitzki wrote:
> [...]
> > In this case it will be sufficient to make sure that the compiler won't
> > reorder the reads on the reading side, which might be given as one of
> > the variables involed beeing volatile qualified.               ^^^^^^
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> What makes you think so?

I mean: what makes you think that compiler won't reorder when "one of
the variables involed beeing volatile qualified."

regards,
alexander.

.