Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Joe Seigh
Date : Mon Aug 29 2005 03:24 pm

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Joe Seigh wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>I already proved processor consistency doesn't work the way you think
>>it does.   
> 
> 
> http://research.compaq.com/wrl/people/kourosh/papers/1990-rc-isca.pdf
> http://research.compaq.com/wrl/people/kourosh/papers/1993-tr-68.pdf

Same thing.
I do not think this "processor consistency" means what you think it means.
> 
> 
>>QED.
> 
> 
> QED. ;-)

I do not think this QED means what you think it means.

-- 
Joe Seigh

When you get lemons, you make lemonade.
When you get hardware, you make software.

.