Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Fri Aug 26 2005 01:29 am


Joe Seigh wrote:
[...]
> > That's what I thought. In this case there is no difference between
> > cchlb_true and cchlb (and ccacq, and even plain acq because of the fake
> > control dependency.)
> >
> 
> You're not entirely sure what Alexander is talking about either?

http://tinyurl.com/amlh4

regards,
alexander.

.