Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Fri Aug 26 2005 01:25 am


Peter Dimov wrote:
[...]
> That's what I thought. In this case there is no difference between
> cchlb_true and cchlb (and ccacq, and even plain acq because of the fake
> control dependency.)

Yep. http://tinyurl.com/7nkrt

regards,
alexander.

.