Subj : Re: stupid threading question ....
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Daniel Rayment
Date : Mon Aug 15 2005 10:23 pm

actually i lied  there is one "shared" value  that being the address of 
the "work" function.    which i dereferece to call the  function in the 
thread.  but obviously it wont change any and each thread has a pointer 
copy of its own.  call it a read only shared.

.