Subj : Re: posix and lock-free algorithms
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Joe Seigh
Date : Sat Aug 13 2005 09:18 am

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Joe Seigh wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>How's the C++ threads definition stuff going these days?  
> 
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/dry54
> 
You mean
http://decadentplace.org.uk/pipermail/cpp-threads_decadentplace.org.uk/2005-August/000566.html

Why doesn't he know about atomic_ops in here
http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/qprof/

I was afraid of this.  The semantics are going to be defined in terms of an
implementation.

BTW, unless you are trying to annoy people, quit using tinyurl.  It's bad
netiquett.

-- 
Joe Seigh

When you get lemons, you make lemonade.
When you get hardware, you make software.

.