Subj : Re: workq: condvar vs semaphore
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Sat Aug 06 2005 12:11 am


David Tiktin wrote:
[...]
> discussion.  Do I understand that the point is (in the context of my
> question) that condvars are just the right tool for the job?  

Yes.
                                                               (And I
> should get the book!)  If so, and I haven't got them (Win32, say),
> what's the next best thing?

Download pthread-win32 or perhaps boost.thread (albeit it still has 
a busted condvar's destructor, I'm afraid).

regards,
alexander.

.