Subj : Re: implementing atomic<> on x86
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Fri Jul 29 2005 03:38 pm


Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
> Thanks.  Are the compiler hints necessary for the msync::none
> operations?  

See below. I've "deprecated" msync::none. New naked stuff labels 
naked_competing, naked_noncompeting and naked_exclusive replaced 
msync::none.

http://groups.google.de/group/comp.programming.threads/msg/a4ab885904e01116
http://groups.google.de/group/comp.programming.threads/msg/9084ae26101a0e96

regards,
alexander.

.