Subj : Re: recursive mutexes
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Date : Sun May 22 2005 12:34 pm

"Chris Thomasson" <_no_damn_spam_cristom@_no_damn_comcast.net_spam> writes:

>> I don't know about others, but gcc should not reorder things around
>> "volatile asm" with correct inputs/outputs/clobbers in a way which
>> breaks multithreaded code.
>>
>> And if it does, it's a bug and an external function will break this
>> as well.
>
> http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.programming.threads/msg/433dcb152bd7697c?hl=en

I can't find an exampple where gcc reorders something that it shouldn't.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

.