Subj : Re: Lockable objects
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Sergei Organov
Date : Thu May 19 2005 10:44 pm

"Uenal Mutlu" <520001085531-0001@t-online.de> writes:

> "Sergey P. Derevyago" wrote
> > Uenal Mutlu wrote:
> > > I'm predicting that in the near future all non-trivial objects the
> > > programming language offers (esp. C++ & STL) will have
> > > some built-in synchronization methods for the user, like:
> > >   Lock()
> > >   Unlock()
> > >   TryLock()
> > >   IsLocked()
> > >   GetLockCount()
> > > And most probly the locking will be done by using recursive mutices internally.
> > >
> > It's really bad idea. Seems like you don't quite understand the basics.
> > Well, read this:
> > http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/msg/dfd419db3f3a86c5
> 
> Thanks for the link. I had to laugh about the argumentation :-)

I'm afraid that laughing is the result of lacking either desire or
enough mental power to actually understand it.

-- 
Sergei.

.