Subj : Re: Lockable objects
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Uenal Mutlu
Date : Thu May 19 2005 08:14 pm

"Sergey P. Derevyago" wrote
> Uenal Mutlu wrote:
> > I'm predicting that in the near future all non-trivial objects the
> > programming language offers (esp. C++ & STL) will have
> > some built-in synchronization methods for the user, like:
> >   Lock()
> >   Unlock()
> >   TryLock()
> >   IsLocked()
> >   GetLockCount()
> > And most probly the locking will be done by using recursive mutices internally.
> >
> It's really bad idea. Seems like you don't quite understand the basics.
> Well, read this:
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/msg/dfd419db3f3a86c5

Thanks for the link. I had to laugh about the argumentation :-)

.