Subj : Re: Challenge: Multithreading & Synchronization
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Uenal Mutlu
Date : Wed May 18 2005 05:23 pm

"Uenal Mutlu" wrote
> "Oliver Battenfeld" wrote
> > Uenal Mutlu wrote:
> >
> > > (some call this "thread synchonization"):
> >
> > yes. And with good reason. Why don't you?
>
> Because it's wrong. There is no need to synchronize threads.
> Access to shared objects have to be synchronized, not "threads synchronized".

Here's IMO another mumbo-jumbo:
  "passing an object from one thread to another thread"

I wonder how "passing an object from one thread to another" is done.

.