Subj : Re: [RFC] Boost.Threads on its way to C++0x
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Randy Howard
Date : Thu Apr 28 2005 09:18 pm

In article <d4qlkg$kkr$1@domitilla.aioe.org>, pdimov@gmail.com 
says...
> Randy Howard wrote:
> > I didn't say I wanted to write some new library.  I'm not sure why
> > you are being argumentative, I simply asked why a standards body
> > would ignore a widely used solution just because Microsoft does not
> > currently include a header file.
> 
> There are some indications that they might acknowledge the existence of the 
> Posix threading standard after all.

Very good news, except they're probably bluffing.  Watch out for the
NIH 'improvements'.  :-)

 
 

-- 
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard
 to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig

.