Subj : Re: load-after-store reordering for x86 wrt smr...
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Tue Mar 15 2005 02:40 pm


Joe Seigh wrote:
[...]
> Fortunately, most architectures support dependent load memory ordering,
> otherwise you'd have to use load/load membars for them.

On architectures that support dependent load memory ordering, msync::
ddhlb (actually msync::ddacq) is simply implied everythere. This is 
bad, not good. 

regards,
alexander.

.